A Reader's Thoughts on Pet Euthanasia and Estate Planning
I have written extensively on the various views on euthanasia for pets.
I recently received this email from one of our readers in response to a previous posting by another reader.
I can't possibly condone euthanizing perfectly healthy animals just because I'm no longer around. I would think it best to plan for your companion animals as follows: (1) Name individual(s) who can have the first option of whether to take your animals when you die; or (2) If there is no such individual, look to the place that you got your pet. Any breeder, rescue or shelter worth a lick should have had a contract stating that they would take the animal back (and should be given the opportunity to OK the individual who you name in option #1); or (3) If that fails, look to the local shelter -- or rescue if you are not satisfied with your local shelter.
The reader's blanket statements just don't hold up. First, I do not understand the statement that cruel people adopt from shelters. Many, many wonderful folks adopt many, many wonderful animals from shelters every year. Second, there are so many incredible rescue organizations out there, many of which are foster only, with no cages at all. For that matter, more and more local shelters are also setting up foster programs.
Don't get me wrong -- I believe euthanasia has its time and place. It just seems incredibly egotistical to me to think that an animal shouldn't go on because I'm no longer around. I guess I have more faith in people, shelters and rescues than this particular reader.
Your thoughts or response?
http://www.pettrustlawblog.com/admin/trackback/204037
