Attorneys are Active Animal Advocates

Some attorneys classify themselves as animal attorneys or attorneys that work in the area of animal law.

What exactly is this critter called animal law?

Attorney Emily A. Gardner  of Hawaii, in her website, states that she is an attorney devoted to animal law.

Ms. Gardner defines the field here,

“…Animal law has become a distinct legal discipline, with its own body of case law and a growing number of practitioners and academics. The practice of animal law deals primarily with resolving legal issues and situations in which the nature of animals–including their legal status, behavior or biology–is an important factor. Although animals themselves typically do not have standing (meaning the right to sue and be sued on their own behalf) people who care about animals, or who own them or have suffered harm by them often do. As a general rule, if a person or a group of people can show that they have a real and tangible stake in a legal claim involving animals, they can have their grievances heard in a court of law…”

Ms. Gardner proposed the current Hawaii Pet Trust legislation that was adopted by the state in 2005.

She was also invited to testify before the Hawaiian House Judiciary committee concerning her legislation.

She provided insightful reasoning for the passage of the bill when she testified before the Committee;

“…There are many good, caring, intelligent people in Hawaii who want to be able to provide for their pets through the creation of a trust. H.B. 1453 will give them, and their attorneys, the certainty of creation of an enforceable document -- it will do away with all the uncertainties surrounding pet trusts that currently exist.

At the same time, the legislation contains a provision which would allow a court to reduce a bequest deemed in excess of the reasonable needs of the pet-beneficiary, thereby providing a mechanism to prevent excesses which might bring the law into criticism. An attorney counseling their clients would surely inform them of this provision and advise them accordingly…”



She further testified that the bill also contained a provision exempting the trust from the common law against perpetuities, which would allow for the provision of care for long-lived pets such as birds  and reptiles and that the legislation would have little administrative burden, as Court appointed enforcement of the trust would be available only by petition.

When asked who might possibly be opposed to the newly proposed legislation, she responded,

   “I have wracked my brain for an answer. The only one I've come up with is "The nieces and nephews who didn't care enough to visit auntie, and who are passed over for a bequest in favor of Spot and Fido."

Shouldn't we permit people to care for those most dear to them in the event of their untimely demise, even if those are dogs, cats, or birds rather than people?”

There are many devoted animal owners and lovers throughout the United States.

Fortunately, there are also many attorneys who are included in this group and are willing to share their time, energy and efforts to further the various causes for you and your pets.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.pettrustlawblog.com/admin/trackback/69621
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.